Paul Pacter: Profile and Interview

 

Accountancy Age online published an April 2010 article called “Profile: Paul Pacter, international standard setter.” The article states that, although some people may not recognise his name, Paul Pacter is one of the most influential men in the history of international accounting standards."  Since 2000, he has played a variety of roles including director of standards for small and medium-sized entities at the International Accounting Standards Board and director at the global IFRS office for Deloitte in Hong Kong. During the 1990s, he served as staff member at the International Accounting Standards Committee working on projects including financial instruments, interim financial reporting, segment reporting, discontinuing operations, extractive industries, agriculture, and electronic financial reporting. From 1984-1989, he was vice chairman of the advisory council to the US Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

 

On July 12, 2011, an Interview with Paul Pacter was conducted in New York City by James Stocker for the Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society’s virtual museum and archive on the history of financial regulation. A 53-page transcript of that interview notes that, during the 2000s, he also set up a very popular website (www.iasplus.com) for accountants involved in international accounting standards. Pacter comments that: “This was done for Deloitte. We just had an idea that there ought to be someplace out on the Internet where all sorts of information about international accounting standards was available. The old IASC didn’t have much of a website, although I did that too, I taught myself the HTML and the graphics and how to do FTP. Deloitte said, “Why don’t you set something up for IASs?” We opened shop as a free site. We opened the door in December 2000. Visitor numbers grew dramatically. When I left Deloitte in June 2010, we were getting 60,000 to 70,000 visitors a week – unique visitors. We had about 1,000 webpages. We had 4,000 downloadable PDF files. It was, and still is, the biggest website in a very narrow area of interest, international accounting standards.”

 

Looking back at a long career, Pacter comments: “...I must just say out of respect for the U.S. SEC, they’ve been a great contributor to accounting standards. They have stayed out of the development of the standards. They’ve encouraged and prodded and commented. They’ve insisted on high quality implementation. For that, I say I have the greatest respect for the commission and for their counterparts around the world. We don’t want politics setting accounting standards. We don’t want politicians setting accounting standards any more than I want them telling my surgeon how to do my surgery. Set the broad principles and let the private sector do the job. The commission has done that, and I thank them for that.”

The Auditor’s Standard Report (1975)

In November 1975, the Auditing Standards Committee of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants issued an exposure draft dealing with The Auditor’s Standard Report. This Exposure Draft was the first stage of a complete updating and revision of the CICA Handbook Section 5500 - The Auditors’ Report.

According to the exposure draft, “The auditor's report is a comprehensive subject and the Committee believes that it would be useful and more efficient to divide present Section 5500 into several separate sections within the Handbook under such section headings as the following: Section 5400 The Auditor’s Standard Report; Section 5500 The Auditor’s Reporting Reservations; Section 5600 Special Reports; and Section 5700 Other Reporting Matters.”

The exposure draft stated that: “The auditor’s standard report is normally presented in two paragraphs. The first ("scope") paragraph identifies the financial statements reported on and contains a reference to the scope and nature of the auditor’s examination. The second ("opinion") paragraph expresses the auditor’s opinion resulting from that examination.” The major changes proposed in the exposure draft were (a) revision of the scope paragraph to state that the auditor’s examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; and (b) removal of the two-part opinion concept.

Achieving International Harmonization of Accounting Standards (1975)

In July 1975, the Accounting Research Committee of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) issued an exposure draft on International Accounting Standards for inclusion in the CICA Handbook. The exposure draft notes that the CICA is a member of the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) whose objectives are “to formulate and publish in the public interest, basic standards to be observed in the presentation of audited accounts and financial statements,and to promote their worldwide acceptance and observance.”

The exposure draft sets out the procedures that the Accounting Research Committee will follow when an International Accounting Standard is issued. In addition, it notes that: “For companies that report in an international environment, it is desirable to disclose that accounting principles generally accepted in Canada have been followed in preparing the financial statements. It is also desirable to disclose conformity with or identify deviations from International Accounting Standards (but not necessarily the effect on the financial statements). Appropriate disclosure would be in the Summary of Accounting Policies.”

Principles-based standards and professional judgment - then and now

At a historic roundtable discussion in New York, the chairman (Charles B. Couchman) stated that: “For many years the leading practitioners of public accountancy have been reducing the practice of accountancy to rules and standards as far as it has been found practical and logical to do so. The elements that make up financial statements have been reduced to standard classifications to the extent permitted by complicated and constantly changing transactions of the business world. Rules have been adopted covering, to a large extent, the various entries affecting the financial classifications. These classifications and these rules have been made widely available through books, articles, addresses and accounting curricula. Practically all the progress that has been made in reducing accountancy to rules and standards has been accomplished by the public accounting profession.”

“If all of the transactions of business were susceptible to analysis into a definite and rigid number of effects that could be analyzed to an extent that would allow exact classification, then rules could be adopted that would cover correctly each one. However, that is not the case. No matter how long one is engaged in an extensive practice of accountancy, he is continually faced  by new and unexpected transactions, each legitimate but each presenting combinations of effects not previously encountered. That is why the sorting of accounting transactions is rigid classifications to which rules and standards may be applied without distortion of fact is a slow process and cannot be otherwise.”

“No fixed rule may be laid down until all of the accounting elements that may fall within its scope have been studied and their effects determined so completely as to bring exact knowledge that the rule, when applied to them, will result in a proper statement of financial facts. Even then the rule must be subject to possible exception, as there is always the possibility that a new and unexpected set of circumstances may arise to which the rigid application of this rule would result in distortion of truth.”

“It is true, not only of accountancy, but of almost every other complicated subject, that the one who has only a smattering of knowledge of it considers that the subject is reasonably simple and that he can readily devise rules governing each phase thereof. To the simple, all things are simple. It is only when one goes deeply into the subject, whatever it may be, that he becomes aware of the complications and the difficulties of proper treatment that is applicable to each element.”

To learn more about the history of the principles versus rules debate, read the transcript of an October 19, 1937 roundtable at the Waldorf-Astoria, New York titled “To What Extent Can the Practice of Accounting Be Reduced to Rules and Standards?” For more information and different perspectives regarding this ongoing debate, refer to previous postings during the past year.