A History of the AICPA and Volunteer Committees

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and its predecessors have a history dating back to 1887, when the American Association of Public Accountants (AAPA) was formed.  In 1916, the American Association was succeeded by the Institute of Public Accountants, at which time there was a membership of 1,150. The name was changed to the American Institute of Accountants in 1917 and remained so until 1957, when it changed to its current name of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The American Society of Certified Public Accountants was formed in 1921 and acted as a federation of state societies. The Society was merged into the Institute in 1936 and, at that time, the Institute agreed to restrict its future members to CPAs.

The use of committees began even before the AAPA was formed in 1887.  At the first meeting of what would become the AAPA on December 22, 1886, those present authorized the appointment of a committee to draft rules and regulations.  Beyond this first preliminary committee, the first Bylaws of the AAPA in 1897 established three committees: Finance and Audit Committee, Committee on Elections, Qualifications and Examinations, and the Committee on Bylaws.  The number of committees grew continually over the years.

(For more information, see the AICPA website section on History of AICPA Volunteering.)

A Future for the Accountancy Profession: The Quest for Closure and Integration, 1957-1970

In October 2001, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) published A Future for the Accountancy Profession: The Quest for Closure and Integration, 1957-1970 (339 pages). The Foreword, by Professor Andrew Christie, ICAS President, notes that: “On assuming the Presidency of ICAS in April 2001, there were a number of key strategic issues which the Institute had started to address. Firstly, the unrestricted use of the term ‘accountant.’ At a time when ICAS is increasingly regulating the activities of its members, there remains a population of ‘accountants’ whose work is unrestricted and who compete with qualified practitioners. Secondly, investigating how the Institute can become more relevant to the large number of its members who are not in practice but employed in industry and commerce. Thirdly, how to ensure that the governance of the Institute is designed to adequately represent the interests of chartered accountants in the diverse environments in which they work. Fourthly, maximising the use of modern communications to enhance the involvement of the membership in the formulation of policy.”

Christie goes on to say: “It is intriguing to discover from this monograph by Ken Shackleton and Stephen Walker that these issues were familiar to our forebears. The problem of how to define the ‘accountant’ in the context of the changing nature of the work performed by qualified accountants has surfaced as a problem during several attempts to draft legislation for the regulation of the profession. At the centre of the efforts to unify the professional organisations during the 1960s was the need to address the fact that while the chartered institutes were established as organisations for practising accountants, an increasing proportion of their members were engaged in other fields. The study reveals the potential difficulties in devising governance structures which are reactive to the changing interests and characteristics of institute memberships. Another key finding is the embarrassing consequences for the profession’s leaders of failing to listen to their own constituents.”

He concludes that “This monograph, emanating from the Institute’s Accounting History Committee, is an important contribution to our understanding of a formative event in the post-war history of the UK accountancy profession. The messages it conveys remain relevant today as the accountancy bodies continue to review their organisation.”

Meeting the Challenge of Change – Report of the CICA Long-Range Strategic Planning Committee (1986)

A 1986 report by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) states (on page 5): “The Canadian CA profession - like the accounting profession worldwide - is facing fundamental and pervasive change. Led primarily by the rapidly evolving information technology that is revolutionizing business operations, but due also to altered perceptions about the value of the traditional attest audit, the role of chartered accountants in society - whatever their area of practice - is changing dramatically. CAs in public practice face new and increasing demands from their clients for services extending beyond those related to historical financial information and income tax advice and toward future-oriented information necessary for economic decision making. In the process, the CAs role is expanding from that of reporter and analyst of past events to communicator and adviser about business information affecting the future.”

The report further states: “CAs outside public practice - those in industry and government, for example - are no less subject to these demands, albeit from their employers. And CAs in education must face the challenging task of educating the profession's future members to meet this challenge. In an effort to manage change and provide strategic directions for our profession, the CICA Board of Governors formed the Long-Range Strategic Planning Committee in February 1984. Over the past two years, our assessment of these changes, via member and user surveys, focus groups, committee research, literature review and presentations at CICA and provincial institute conferences, has led us to develop an exciting vision of what the CA profession might become over the next 10 to 20 years. It is a vision of a more broadly-based profession whose highly-skilled members are the recognized experts in meeting the needs of an information society.”

The Committee’s conclusions are summarized in a mission statement and 14 specific strategic proposals. These proposals and the overall strategic direction are interrelated and should be looked on as a total concept. To learn more, read Meeting the Challenge of Change – Report of the CICA Long-Range Strategic Planning Committee (1986). Because of its multi-coloured front cover, it is commonly referred to as the “Rainbow Report.”

Strategic Crossroads for the CA Profession

The Report of the Task Force on Strategic Planning was completed in July 2004 and subsequently endorsed by each of the governing bodies of the Canadian CA profession. The Message from the Chair provides a perspective on the strategic planning process. It notes: “By early 2003, the profession’s last major “vision” project from the mid-1990s required a rethink, given the many shifts in our environment over the last decade. The Task Force on Strategic Planning was established in the summer of 2003. Member and market input and analysis occupied the initial period of the Task Force’s work.”

“This report can only capture a portion of the very valuable intelligence and ideas we garnered from this activity but we are satisfied that our recommendations are based on solid evidence and sound analysis. Past strategic planning by our profession was our starting place for this exercise. We found the underlying planning to be very strong but did observe problems with execution, given our complex decision-making framework and diverse priorities of the provincial Institutes/Ordre. We are confident this has been overcome by the strong support and cooperation among the senior management group, the Council of Senior Executives (CSE), regarding our work. We recommended a new vision “trusted, internationally recognized financial leaders in senior management, advisory, tax and assurance roles.” ...CAs enjoy a very strong starting position in achieving this vision but bold action is required in four areas — branding, education, member relations and the public trust.”

(Read the CICA report Strategic Crossroads for the CA Profession and the related Appendices, published in October 2004.)

Report of the Commission to Study the Public’s Expectations of Audits - June 1988

The Report of the Commission to Study the Public’s Expectations of Audits (Macdonald Commission Report) was released by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) in June 1988. The Commission had a threefold mandate: (1) to study the public’s expectations of audits; (2) to determine whether there is a gap between what the public expects or needs from auditors and what auditors can reasonably expect to accomplish; (3) to the extent there is an identifiable gap, to make suggestions as to how the gap might be narrowed.

The  Macdonald Commission Report made numerous recommendations regarding: strengthening the audit environment; accounting standards; extensions of financial disclosure; valuations and estimates; disclosure outside financial statements; exercise of auditor’s judgment; additional auditor responsibilities; clarification of financial reporting responsibilities; professional self-regulation; public input to auditing standards; employee fraud; management fraud; illegal acts; changes of auditors; communication with regulators; accounting standards for financial institutions; auditor reporting on internal control; and, auditor’s knowledge of the business.

A listing of the report’s 50 recommendations is provided in Appendix A (pages 139-146) of the report.

CCAF-FCVI – 25th Anniversary Journal 2005

The CCAF was originally called the Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation but, in recent years, the name was contracted to CCAF-FCVI. The CCAF is a national non-profit foundation, established in 1980. Its primary activities are research and education. Established as a public-private sector partnership, the CCAF is funded by the federal and provincial governments and the private sector. Its vision is the achievement of excellence in public sector governance, management and accountability.


The CCAF focus is on public sector organizations that operate in an environment of complex accountability relationships. These include governments, institutions and organizations that create, deliver or regulate activities that support the health, educational, social and economic well-being of Canadians.

To mark its 25^th anniversary in 2005, the CCAF published CCAF-FCVI – 25th Anniversary Journal. The Journal includes articles from various senior officials focusing on their own experiences and activities in the areas of public sector accountability, audit, management and governance. It also includes a brief history of the CCAF's research program over the last 25 years (pages 95-106).

CICA Corporate Reporting Awards celebrate 60 years of excellence

This year marks the diamond anniversary of the Chartered Accountants of Canada’s Corporate Reporting Awards. Since 1941 the program has been centre stage in Canada’s evolution to best practice reporting models.  By providing important recognition for those committed to advancing business reporting, the program has helped drive the development of best practices in financial reporting, corporate governance disclosure, electronic disclosure and sustainable development reporting, all of which are now regarded as essential components of the corporate reporting model. Judging organizations include the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst & Young, Deloitte, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canadian Investor Relations Institute, and Toronto CFA Society.  (Read the article “Corporate Reporting Awards celebrate 60 years of excellence” in the June-July 2011 issue of CAmagazine online.)

The Canadian Chartered Accountant – July 1921

On page 1 of this 10^th anniversary issue, a Note by the Publication Committee stated “The Canadian Chartered Accountant enters upon its eleventh year of publication with this issue. Hitherto a quarterly, it becomes, in response to demands from an appreciative constituency, a bi-monthly publication, at however, an increased price, rendered necessary by the steadily advancing costs of everything entering into its make-up, excepting Editorial services and it is felt that the time has arrived when that painstaking and uncomplaining person, the Editor, should be remembered also.”

The Note goes on to say that “Concurrently, it has been decided that no further advertising will be accepted by the Magazine, excepting from the Institutes or affiliated sources, the intention being to preserve its character and limit its use to matters of purely professional and technical interest. Our advertisers during the past ten years are extended our best thanks for the patronage and encouragement they have given us, and we trust that the publicity that the Magazine has given them may not have been wholly without benefit to them. We bespeak the goodwill and assistance of our readers, with the objects of making the Magazine more valuable and interesting, and of enlarging its list of subscribers to the point of being self-sustaining. Nothing beyond that is desired.”

Pages 4-11 of this issue of The Canadian Chartered Accountant include the Dominion Association of Chartered Accountants (DACA, now the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) Act of Incorporation (assented to May 15, 1902), bylaws, List of Past Presidents and Secretaries (1902-1920) and the officers and council for 1920-1921.

(Read The Canadian Chartered Accountant, July 1921. Also, refer to the first edition of The Canadian Chartered Accountant, July1911.)

Corporate Governance and the New York Stock Exchange

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has long been a leading proponent for the highest standards of corporate governance and ethical behaviour. Its listing standards have included governance rules for approximately 150 years. It was the NYSE that first required companies to issue regular financial statements, as well as to provide quarterly earnings announcements and conduct independent audits of financial statements, all of which were included as part of the NYSE’s listing standards before any of the federal securities legislation coming out of the Great Depression. The leadership role of the NYSE on governance matters continued during the middle of the 20th century, when the NYSE pioneered such developments as required proxy statement distribution, a minimum number of outside directors, and audit committees made up entirely of independent directors. To learn more about the NYSE and governance, read the Report of the New York Stock Exchange Commission on Corporate Governance (September 23, 2010). The report contains a summary of significant corporate governance developments since 2000 (pages 10-23).

History of the CICA Corporate Reporting Awards

The CICA Corporate Reporting Awards (CRA) began in the early 1950s. Originally, they were based on hardcopy annual reports (from 1951-1992). Today, the awards have expanded beyond the annual reports to include sustainable development awards (introduced in 1993), MD&A (introduced in 1995), corporate governance awards (introduced in 1996), electronic financial reporting (introduced in 2001) and scorecards (introduced in the late 1990s). Now, the major federal crown corporations are also included (introduced in 2007). For a brief history of the Corporate Reporting Awards, refer to the March 2010 research paper “Corporate Reporting Awards and Financial Reporting Quality” by Tim Bauer (tdbauer@uwaterloo.ca) and J. Efrim Boritz (jeboritz@uwaterloo.ca) – pages 6-12 and Appendix B).