A Review of Bookkeeping and Accounting in 1945

A 1945 Vocational Guidance Film on Bookkeeping and Accounting is available for viewing online at the SEC Historical Society website. This entertaining 10-minute video was provided by courtesy of the Prelinger Archives, United States Library of Congress. It discusses a variety of matters including the household budget book, business bookkeeping, the role of the bookkeeper compared to that of the accountant, an accounting department, calculating and bookkeeping machines, cost accounting, special investigations, preparing tax returns and business principles. It also distinguishes a private accountant from a public accountant (such as a CPA) who should have a pleasing personality, a strong moral character and legible handwriting.

 

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards: Audit Evidence – 1977

In February 1975, the CICA’s Auditing Standards Committee (AuSC) proposed, subject to comments received following exposure, to publish the contents of an Exposure Draft as CICA Handbook: Section 5100 - Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. In July 1976, the AuSC issued a 32-page Exposure Draft on “Internal Control” (for inter-related Sections 5200 to 5230).

Then, in May 1977, the AuSC issued a 12-page Exposure Draft on “Audit Evidence” (for Sections 5300). This material was intended to provide guidance, in general terms, as to the attributes of audit evidence and the manner in which the auditor obtains and evaluates such evidence to adhere to field work standard (iii) within generally accepted auditing standards. Field work standard (iii) states: “"Sufficient appropriate audit evidence should be obtained, by such means as inspection, observation, enquiry, confirmation, computation and analysis, to afford a reasonable basis to support the content of the report.”

The Exposure Draft emphasized that “The auditor is concerned with audit evidence in all phases of his audit engagement, from the planning stage, through the study and evaluation of internal control including the performance of compliance auditing procedures, to the performance of substantive auditing procedures.” It addressed the following matters: Introduction and Definition; Knowledge of the Business; Necessity for Performing Substantive Auditing Procedures; Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Evidence; Methods of Obtaining Evidence; Timing of Auditing Procedures; Errors and Irregularities; and Evaluation of Audit Evidence. In this regard, “The auditor relies on his professional judgment [emphasis added] in deciding which procedures will give him sufficient appropriate audit evidence. He evaluates the audit evidence gathered to determine the content of his report.”

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards: Internal Control – 1976

In February 1975, the CICA’s Auditing Standards Committee (AuSC) proposed, subject to comments received following exposure, to publish the contents of an Exposure Draft as CICA Handbook: Section 5100 - Generally Accepted Auditing Standards.

The following year, in July 1976, the AuSC issued a 32-page Exposure Draft on “Internal Control.” This material (for inter-related Sections 5200 to 5230) was intended to provide an explanation, in general terms, of what the auditor should do in order to comply with field work standard (ii) within Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). Field work standard (ii) states: “There should be an appropriately organized study and evaluation of those internal controls on which the auditor subsequently relies in determining the nature, extent and timing of auditing procedures."

The Exposure Draft addressed the following matters: Management’s objectives; Basic components of internal control systems; Auditor's objective regarding internal control; Auditor's approach – overview; Auditor's study and evaluation; and, Relationship to substantive auditing procedures. A decision tree was provided in Appendix A on page 32 (refer to the graphic above). It is noteworthy that the Exposure Draft also mentioned that the AuSC was working on a project to provide a similar explanation with respect to field work standard (iii) - Audit Evidence.

Andersen, Auditing and Atonement

Ten years ago, Arthur Andersen was forced to surrender its licences in the United States after the Enron scandal, precipitating its global collapse. December 2011 marked 10 years since Enron, the Texas energy company, filed for bankruptcy after perpetrating one of the world's biggest business frauds. More significantly for the accounting profession, May 2012 marks a decade since the Enron indictment in the United States, and the beginning of the end for the well-respected Arthur Andersen, one of what was then the Big Five accounting firms.

The firm was convicted of obstructing justice by destroying thousands of documents related to its work for Enron. While the ruling was overturned in 2005 on technical grounds, it came too late to resuscitate the brand. For the profession, the scandal drew wide scrutiny on the supposed compromised position of large firms that audit the books of clients to whom they also provide consultancy services.

For a look back on the past decade of reactions, reforms and soul-searching in the accounting profession, read the article “ANDERSEN, AUDITING AND ATONEMENT: The accounting profession 10 years after Enron” by George W. Russell at GAA Accounting online.

CICA - Good Audit Working Papers: An Audit Technique Study (1970)

According to the Foreword in a 1970 CICA Audit Technique Study, Gertrude Mulcahy, FCA, Director of Research, states: “The preparation of audit working papers is an essential part of audit work. However, because they are part of the normal routine followed in all audit engagements, there is a very real danger that the basic purposes of preparing such papers may be overlooked, with the result that the papers may fail to achieve these purposes.”

In this 35-page study, called Good Audit Working Papers, the Study Group provides a statement of the purposes of working papers and develops what they believe to be a systematic approach to the content, organization, review and retention of good audit working papers as a basis for practitioners to evaluate their own procedures. During the formulation of this approach, the Study Group also examined questions relating to the ownership of working papers and the preparation of working papers for non-audit engagements.

Basic principles to assist in the resolution of these questions are also set out. In addition, several suggestions on the preparation of good audit working papers are included in the Appendices. Gerald Trites, FCA is acknowledged for his work on various drafts of this landmark Study published more than 40 years ago.

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards – 1975

Thirty-seven years ago, in February 1975, the CICA’s Auditing Standards Committee proposed, subject to comments received following exposure, to publish the contents of an Exposure Draft as CICA Handbook: Section 5100 - Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. This Exposure Draft was a re-exposure of material previously included in a November 1973 Exposure Draft. At that time the Committee used wording closely following and, in most places, identical to that used in the AICPA Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1, Codification of Auditing Standards and Procedures.

The Introduction said: "Although the Committee’s intention remains, as a general principle, to use words closely following AICPA Statements (or other professional pronouncements) in cases where this is appropriate, consideration of responses received to the 1973 Exposure Draft indicated that several significant changes were desirable in this particular case. The November 1973 Exposure Draft contained two other Sections of background material, which have been eliminated. "Responsibilities and Functions of the Independent Auditor" required extensive changes and will be dealt with at a later date. The discussion previously included under the heading "The General Standards" related to ethical matters [emphasis added], which are within the jurisdiction of the provincial Institutes and Order. Accordingly, it is the Committee’s intention not to deal further with this topic in the Auditing Recommendations Section of the CICA Handbook, other than including the substance of the three November 1973 general standards as one general standard in paragraph 5100.02 in the interest of completeness."

It is noteworthy that the Introduction also said that, oncurrent with the issuance of this Exposure Draft as an Auditing Recommendation, the Committee would intend to amend the Introduction to Auditing Recommendations by inserting the following as a new paragraph in the "Application" section:

"Among the Recommendations issued, GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS, Section 5100, constitute the basic professional standards with which, in the Committee’s view, the auditor should comply when reporting upon financial statements. In adhering to such basic standards the auditor should have regard to the specific Auditing Recommendations in the Handbook while exercising his professional judgment [emphasis added] as to what procedures are required for such adherence. In addition, the Handbook provides Recommendations with respect to unaudited financial statements, to which Generally Accepted Auditing Standards do not apply."

Setting accounting and auditing standards in Canada - 1978

The article “Setting Accounting and Auditing Standards” was originally published in the September 1978 issue of CAmagazine. At that time, R.D. Thomas, FCA, was the CICA General Director of Research.

This article provides a detailed review of the existing standard-setting process. It notes that: “While the Research Department makes continual efforts to keep the 27,000 CICA members and over 13,000 other subscribers to the CICA Handbook informed on its projects in process, relatively few people appreciate the wide diversity of experience that those responsible bring to bear in the setting of Accounting and Auditing Recommendations, and the care they take in doing so."

"It’s important that those affected by these Recommendations know this background for at least two reasons:

(1) With the advent of the National Securities Administrators’ National Policy 27 and recent corporate legislation, Handbook Recommendations now have “authority” attached to them by federal and provincial government bodies, in addition to the support that has been given to them through the provincial institutes’ / order’s Rules of Professional Conduct.

(2) With the steady increase in the number and complexity of the subjects being dealt with by our research groups and with the resulting increasing demands on the time of volunteer members of these groups, a major study is now to be undertaken to see how our procedures can be improved. After reviewing the following highlight summary of the issues involved, any comments or suggestions you may have on present or prospective procedures and personnel will be very useful to the in-depth review which will be starting shortly.”

(For more information, refer to the CICA Special Committee on Standard-Setting (SCOSS), Report to the CICA Board of Governors on December 19, 1980.)

Update on the Social Science Research Network

The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) has grown substantially during the last 12 months. The SSRN eLibrary currently has 375,000 paper abstracts from over 175,000 authors and has received 60,000 new submissions during the year. The eLibrary recently delivered its 50 millionth full-text paper download. This is a significant milestone.

During the last year, SSRN changed its server architecture to improve the speed of searches, enhance overall stability and provide the infrastructure required to meet the continued growth. In recent tests, the average eLibrary search time has decreased from 4.5 seconds to less than 1 second. In addition, SSRN's Citereader project with ITX Corp. has extracted 7.4 million references, 4.7 million citations, and 7.7 million footnotes from 306,000 full text papers.

In 2012, SSRN plans to continue expanding its interdisciplinary growth in the social sciences and humanities by creating research networks in Sustainability, Innovation, Rhetoric, Anthropology and Hebrew.

CICA - Materiality in Auditing: An Audit Technique Study (1965)

In 1965, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) first published Materiality in Auditing: An Audit Technique Study. The Foreword to that study notes that: “One of the basic problems in conducting an audit is determining the extent of the examination. While the auditor must ensure that his examination has been in sufficient breadth and depth to warrant the expression of opinion on his client’s financial statements, he must plan his audit program wisely so that the cost of the service to the client is not excessive. Materiality plays an extremely important part in reconciling these two objectives."

"Although materiality has almost become a by-word in the profession, very little has been published to assist the auditor in applying the underlying concept to a particular situation. The Study Group, therefore, felt that this topic should be dealt with first, before proceeding to other topics of interest. The study should be of immediate interest to the members of the profession in public practice and should be a useful reference as future studies are published.”

“The reader should realize that this study discusses the concept of materiality primarily in relation to its effect on auditing procedures. The discussion has necessarily included some reference to the accounting consequences of materiality. But, the complex subject of accounting materiality as a whole - for instance as applied to consistency, classification or disclosure on financial statements - has not been dealt with.

“The members of the Study Group recognized at the outset that the application of the materiality concept rests on judgment - mature judgment based on experience. The consensus of the experience of the group has resulted in a series of guidelines which should be of help to the auditor. These guidelines are offered, not as substitutes for professional judgment but rather as stimulants to the reader by bringing to his attention the factors he should take into account in formulating his judgment.”

A Brief History of the Evolution of Accounting and Auditing Standards in Canada

Prior to 1951, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) was known as the Dominion Association of Chartered Accountants (DACA). It established an Accounting and Auditing Research Committee in 1946, which began issuing a series of bulletins setting out recommended standards of practice on accounting and auditing.


In 1968, it replaced the series of bulletins with a loose-leaf, subject-indexed Handbook that was periodically updated with inserts as the CICA’s committee issued new recommendations. Although the bulletins set out what the committee “considers to be the best accepted practice or its suggested treatment of new elements in accounting statements arising as a result of changes in social or economic conditions,” the recommendations contained in the Handbook were intended to possess greater force. Section 1500.06 in the Handbook, issued in November 1969, stated that any departures from the Handbook recommendations “should be explained in notes to the financial statements with an indication of the reason why the recommendation concerned was not followed.”

In 1975, the Canada Business Corporations Act added a degree of quasi-legislative authority to the Handbook, when Regulations 44 and 45 of the Act proclaimed:

44) The financial statements referred to in paragraph 149(1) of the Act shall, except as otherwise provided by this Part, be prepared in accordance with the standards, as they exist from time to time, of the CICA set out in the Handbook.

45) The auditor’s report referred to in Section 163 of the Act shall, except as otherwise provided by this Part, be prepared in accordance with the standards of the CICA set out in the Handbook.

In 1963, the CICA began publishing research studies on contemporary accounting and auditing topics. Since 1980, it has published a number of research studies on accounting and financial reporting, on auditing and assurance, and on environmental and performance reporting. Most are available as PDF downloads free-of-charge.

In 1991, the CICA replaced the Accounting Standards Committee and the Auditing Standards Committee with the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) and the Auditing Standards Board. Later in that decade, the CICA Task Force on Standard Setting released its final report in May 1998, and among its recommendations was the establishment of an “independent standard setting organization for Canada.”

In addition, the CICA established the Accounting Standards Oversight Council (AcSOC) to support the setting of accounting standards domestically and to contribute to the development of internationally accepted standards. AcSOC’s mandate also includes providing opportunities for the public to comment on all aspects of accounting standard setting, and reporting to the public annually.

In 2005, a firm commitment was made to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), effective January 1, 2011. IFRS have now been incorporated into the CICA Handbook, along with International Auditing Standards (IAS).

The Official Duties of Chartered Accountants - 1891

A lecture called “The Official Duties of Chartered Accountants” was read before the Manchester Chartered Accountants' Students' Society on May 4, 1891. According to that lecture, the duties of a Chartered Accountant may be divided into three classes: Private, Public, and Official.

“By private duties I mean such as are due by a Chartered Accountant to his client when he is instructed to perform an audit or an investigation on behalf of a private association, a firm, or on behalf of individuals, either in their business or private capacity. His duty is then strictly confined to carrying out the instructions of his clients to the best of his professional skill and ability; when he has performed these his responsibilities are at an end.”

“The public duties of a Chartered Accountant have reference to those cases where he acts on behalf of persons who give him general but not definite instructions, and who leave him to carry them out according to his own ideas, in the full belief that he will do his duty in the interest of all concerned, and hold him responsible for so acting. These duties are such as are undertaken by accepting the appointment of Auditor of a public company, of voluntary Liquidator of a company, of Auditor of the accounts of a deceased person's estate on behalf of those interested, either in the division of the estate or in the income derived from investment of the same, and of an Arbitrator, while the official duties are those appertaining to offices or appointments held under the Courts of Justice, whether of the Chancery Division or the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice, or under the County Courts, and under the Board of Trade.”

“It is with the last class of duties that my lecture is concerned. The appointments under the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice are those of Receiver, Receiver and Manager, Provisional Liquidator, Voluntary Liquidator under supervision of the Court, and Liquidator; the appointment under the control of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice is that of Trustee in Bankruptcy. Under the Board of Trade, a Chartered Accountant may receive the special appointment as a skilled Accountant to assist a debtor against whom a Receiving Order under the Bankruptcy Act of 1883 has been made, in the preparation of his statement of affairs, and also to assist the directors or other officials of a company, after an order for winding it up has been made by the Court, in the preparation of a statement of affairs. He may also be appointed the Special Manager of the business of a debtor from the date of the Receiving Order until the appointment of, or rather certification of, a Trustee, or the approval of a scheme, and also the Special Manager of a company after a Winding-up Order has been made by the Court.”

(The full lecture about “The Official Duties of Chartered Accountants - 1891” is available online at Google Docs.)

CICA Task Force on Standard Setting - Final Report 1998

The Final Report of the CICA Task Force on Standard Setting (TFOSS) was issued in May 1998. It represented the culmination of almost two years of deliberations involving extensive communication and consultation with stakeholders in the standard-setting community, both in Canada and abroad. TFOSS expressed a belief in four-long-term goals articulated in its Report. These include the ultimate achievement of one set of internationally-accepted accounting and auditing standards, with Canada playing a significant role in their development.

According to TFOSS, Canada's ability to fulfil that role in the future, as well as to maintain its leadership in setting national private and public sector standards and developing emerging and innovative areas of service to the public, will depend on the commitment of adequate human and financial resources. This commitment has traditionally come from the CICA. But, in the future, TFOSS believes that it must also come from others who benefit from standards, particularly in accounting, but possibly in other areas as well. Their participation and support will serve to enhance the CICA's position as it continues to lead the profession in the years ahead.

Report of the Commission to Study the Public’s Expectations of Audits - June 1988

The Report of the Commission to Study the Public’s Expectations of Audits (Macdonald Commission Report) was released by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) in June 1988. The Commission had a threefold mandate: (1) to study the public’s expectations of audits; (2) to determine whether there is a gap between what the public expects or needs from auditors and what auditors can reasonably expect to accomplish; (3) to the extent there is an identifiable gap, to make suggestions as to how the gap might be narrowed.

The  Macdonald Commission Report made numerous recommendations regarding: strengthening the audit environment; accounting standards; extensions of financial disclosure; valuations and estimates; disclosure outside financial statements; exercise of auditor’s judgment; additional auditor responsibilities; clarification of financial reporting responsibilities; professional self-regulation; public input to auditing standards; employee fraud; management fraud; illegal acts; changes of auditors; communication with regulators; accounting standards for financial institutions; auditor reporting on internal control; and, auditor’s knowledge of the business.

A listing of the report’s 50 recommendations is provided in Appendix A (pages 139-146) of the report.

CCAF-FCVI – 25th Anniversary Journal 2005

The CCAF was originally called the Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation but, in recent years, the name was contracted to CCAF-FCVI. The CCAF is a national non-profit foundation, established in 1980. Its primary activities are research and education. Established as a public-private sector partnership, the CCAF is funded by the federal and provincial governments and the private sector. Its vision is the achievement of excellence in public sector governance, management and accountability.


The CCAF focus is on public sector organizations that operate in an environment of complex accountability relationships. These include governments, institutions and organizations that create, deliver or regulate activities that support the health, educational, social and economic well-being of Canadians.

To mark its 25^th anniversary in 2005, the CCAF published CCAF-FCVI – 25th Anniversary Journal. The Journal includes articles from various senior officials focusing on their own experiences and activities in the areas of public sector accountability, audit, management and governance. It also includes a brief history of the CCAF's research program over the last 25 years (pages 95-106).

Canadian income tax, then and now

It has been almost 40 years since Canada overhauled its tax system, eliminating estate duties and bringing in capital gains tax. Since 1972, we have seen no less than 49 editions of the Income Tax Act. Its length has increased enormously and the complexity exponentially. Changes in technology have aided the Canada Revenue Agency in the selection and audit of taxpayers. Ever-changing legislation, powerful audit tools, information exchange agreements and anti-avoidance rules have made tax planning harder, tax compliance more challenging and tax enforcement easier with key changes over the past 40 years and challenges presented to the accounting profession. (Read the article “Income tax, then and now” in the June-July 2011 issue of CAmagazine online.)

Welcome to the AAA Digital Library!

The mission of the American Accounting Association (AAA) is to promote worldwide excellence in accounting education, research and practice. Founded in 1916 as the American Association of University Instructors in Accounting, its present name was adopted in 1936. The Association is a voluntary organization of persons interested in accounting education and research. The AAA Digital Library includes the following publications: The Accounting Review; Issues in Accounting Education; Accounting Horizons; Accounting and the Public Interest; The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research; AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory; Behavioral Research in Accounting; Current Issues in Auditing; Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting; Journal of Information Systems; Journal of International Accounting Research; Journal of Management Accounting Research; and Journal of the American Taxation Association. All full-text papers are provided in PDF format and are searchable using the Find utility in Adobe Acrobat Reader. All full-text papers provide links to references, as available. The AAA Newsletter, Accounting Education News, as well as the AAA Section Newsletters are also available online, some dating back to 1995.

Social Science Research Network (SSRN)

The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) is devoted to the rapid worldwide dissemination of research and comprises a number of specialized research networks. Each of SSRN's networks encourages the early distribution of research results by publishing submitted abstracts and by soliciting abstracts of top quality research papers around the world. Academic and other Cooperating Institutions provide working papers for distribution through SSRN's Electronic Library and abstracts for publication in SSRN's electronic journals. The SSRN Electronic Library consists of two parts: an Abstract Database containing abstracts on over 28,400 scholarly working papers; and an Electronic Paper Collection currently containing over 13,400 downloadable electronic documents in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.

ICAEW - Accounting History Gateway (Archives)

As noted in a previous posting (February 23, 2011), the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) has created an Accounting History Gateway. As part of the Archives Section of the gateway, the ICAEW conducted an archive survey of member firms in 1991-1992 and the information gathered was published in Chartered accountants in England and Wales - a guide to historical records in 1994. It is a useful starting point for research into accountancy firms, with an overview of the types of records that may have been retained. Archival materials also include Accounting Standards Committee Archives (1952-1990) and Auditing Practices Committee Archives (1971-1991).

Corporate Governance and the New York Stock Exchange

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has long been a leading proponent for the highest standards of corporate governance and ethical behaviour. Its listing standards have included governance rules for approximately 150 years. It was the NYSE that first required companies to issue regular financial statements, as well as to provide quarterly earnings announcements and conduct independent audits of financial statements, all of which were included as part of the NYSE’s listing standards before any of the federal securities legislation coming out of the Great Depression. The leadership role of the NYSE on governance matters continued during the middle of the 20th century, when the NYSE pioneered such developments as required proxy statement distribution, a minimum number of outside directors, and audit committees made up entirely of independent directors. To learn more about the NYSE and governance, read the Report of the New York Stock Exchange Commission on Corporate Governance (September 23, 2010). The report contains a summary of significant corporate governance developments since 2000 (pages 10-23).

A Day of Recognition and Celebration for Quebec Chartered Accountants

This year marks the 75th anniversary of the Quebec City CA Group and the 130th anniversary of the Ordre des comptables agréés du Québec (OCAQ). A day of activities under the theme "Active capital for your success!" was held in Quebec City on September 30, 2010 to celebrate these two important milestones for Quebec CAs. Read the OCAQ News Release and view the Photo Album online.