The First Quarter Century of the GASB (1984–2009): A Perspective on Standard Setting

 

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) was established in April 1984 as the authoritative accounting standard-setting body for state and local governmental entities in the United States. There are over 87,000 state and local entities in the country and for the most part these entities are required to comply with the generally accepted accounting principles established by the GASB. Therefore, the standards promulgated by the GASB are significant. On June 30, 2009, the GASB completed its 25th year of standard setting. Because of its influence and the importance of its mission, a better understanding of the GASB and its accomplishments during its first 25 years of existence may be helpful.

 

Two research papers (Part 1 and Part 2) provide a complete sequential treatment of the GASB’s operational history through the end of its first quarter century. The first paper begins with an historical perspective about municipal accounting issues from colonial times to 1934. The origin of professional self-determining standards is the feature of the second paper, identifying standard-setting bodies that contributed to municipal accounting from 1934 to 1984. The early activities of the GASB are then reviewed. Two appendices are provided to detail the composition of the Board during its first quarter century, along with biographical information about the early Board members and later Chair and Vice Chair personnel.

 

The first paper concludes with a review of the relationship of other governmental standard setting bodies at the federal level and the international level. The second paper provides an overview of the future challenges faced by the GASB and supplies a digest of the standards including appendix and a synoptic summary of the standards the Board has promulgated by topic and by standard number.

 

Gary J. Previts

For more information, read the article “The First Quarter Century of the GASB (1984–2009): A Perspective on Standard Setting” by Helen M. Roybark, Edward N. Coffman and Gary J. Previts.

 

Part 1 of this article was published in ABACUS (Volume 48, Issue 1, pages 1–30, March 2012) and Part 2 was published in ABACUS (Volume 48, Issue 2, pages 147–198, June 2012).

 

 

 

In addition, refer to the article “The GASB Marks 25 Years of Standards-Setting” published in June 2009 on the GASB website.

 

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards: Audit Evidence – 1977

In February 1975, the CICA’s Auditing Standards Committee (AuSC) proposed, subject to comments received following exposure, to publish the contents of an Exposure Draft as CICA Handbook: Section 5100 - Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. In July 1976, the AuSC issued a 32-page Exposure Draft on “Internal Control” (for inter-related Sections 5200 to 5230).

Then, in May 1977, the AuSC issued a 12-page Exposure Draft on “Audit Evidence” (for Sections 5300). This material was intended to provide guidance, in general terms, as to the attributes of audit evidence and the manner in which the auditor obtains and evaluates such evidence to adhere to field work standard (iii) within generally accepted auditing standards. Field work standard (iii) states: “"Sufficient appropriate audit evidence should be obtained, by such means as inspection, observation, enquiry, confirmation, computation and analysis, to afford a reasonable basis to support the content of the report.”

The Exposure Draft emphasized that “The auditor is concerned with audit evidence in all phases of his audit engagement, from the planning stage, through the study and evaluation of internal control including the performance of compliance auditing procedures, to the performance of substantive auditing procedures.” It addressed the following matters: Introduction and Definition; Knowledge of the Business; Necessity for Performing Substantive Auditing Procedures; Sufficiency and Appropriateness of Evidence; Methods of Obtaining Evidence; Timing of Auditing Procedures; Errors and Irregularities; and Evaluation of Audit Evidence. In this regard, “The auditor relies on his professional judgment [emphasis added] in deciding which procedures will give him sufficient appropriate audit evidence. He evaluates the audit evidence gathered to determine the content of his report.”

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards: Internal Control – 1976

In February 1975, the CICA’s Auditing Standards Committee (AuSC) proposed, subject to comments received following exposure, to publish the contents of an Exposure Draft as CICA Handbook: Section 5100 - Generally Accepted Auditing Standards.

The following year, in July 1976, the AuSC issued a 32-page Exposure Draft on “Internal Control.” This material (for inter-related Sections 5200 to 5230) was intended to provide an explanation, in general terms, of what the auditor should do in order to comply with field work standard (ii) within Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). Field work standard (ii) states: “There should be an appropriately organized study and evaluation of those internal controls on which the auditor subsequently relies in determining the nature, extent and timing of auditing procedures."

The Exposure Draft addressed the following matters: Management’s objectives; Basic components of internal control systems; Auditor's objective regarding internal control; Auditor's approach – overview; Auditor's study and evaluation; and, Relationship to substantive auditing procedures. A decision tree was provided in Appendix A on page 32 (refer to the graphic above). It is noteworthy that the Exposure Draft also mentioned that the AuSC was working on a project to provide a similar explanation with respect to field work standard (iii) - Audit Evidence.

The “Going Concern” Assumption: Accounting and Auditing Implications - 1991

The “Going Concern” Assumption: Accounting and Auditing Implications was published by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) in 1991. This 262-page research report was prepared by J.E. Boritz, PhD, FCA, supported by a seven-member advisory group. It assesses the financial reporting and auditing implications of the “going concern” assumption. Particular attention is given to the nature and extent of disclosures in the financial statements and/or auditor's report when there is insufficient support for the assumption due to significant risks or uncertainties facing either the industry or the enterprise.

The “going concern” assumption is important because it underlies generally accepted accounting principles. Financial statements are prepared on the basis that the entity is a “going concern”, meaning that it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of operations.

According to the report, there were 8,664 business bankruptcies in Canada in 1989, accounting for about $2.2 billion in liabilities against assets of only $774 million, representing losses to creditors of more than $1.4 billion. In view of the economic significance of “going concern” disclosures, the lack of professional guidance, and the absence of standards in this area, the purpose of the report is to provide the basis for: 

• an accounting standards project to address the financial reporting implications of the “going concern” assumption in the accounting section of the CICA Handbook;
• an auditing standards project to modify CICA Handbook Section 5510, Reservations in the Auditor's Report, regarding auditor review of management's assertion as a “going concern”;
• an audit techniques study to support the professional judgment process.

The report summarizes relevant pronouncements and current literature and surveys reporting practices in Canada and the United States. In addition, it fulfills its mandate by:

• defining key terms including “financial distress”, “insolvency” and “bankruptcy”.
• discussing whether any reference should be made to the “going concern” assumption in the notes to the financial statements.
• assessing the financial reporting implications when there is insufficient support for the assumption.
• identifying conditions which may bring into question the continuance of an entity as a “going concern”.
• providing guidance on how doubts as to “going concern” status should be expressed.
• evaluating alternative principles governing the presentation of financial information including historical cost, value realizable in orderly liquidation and discounted value.
• determining the need for auditor review of the support for management's implicit or explicit “going concern” assumption.
• assessing the audit implications and providing guidance for reporting when there is insufficient support or inadequate disclosure in the financial statements.
• considering techniques to support the professional judgment process.

The report responds to recommendations in the 1990 publication Approaches to Dealing with Risk and Uncertainty and the 1988 Report of the Commission to Study the Public's Expectations of Audits, which noted the need to warn the public about the risk of business failure and the auditor's responsibility in that connection.

Generally Accepted Auditing Standards – 1975

Thirty-seven years ago, in February 1975, the CICA’s Auditing Standards Committee proposed, subject to comments received following exposure, to publish the contents of an Exposure Draft as CICA Handbook: Section 5100 - Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. This Exposure Draft was a re-exposure of material previously included in a November 1973 Exposure Draft. At that time the Committee used wording closely following and, in most places, identical to that used in the AICPA Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1, Codification of Auditing Standards and Procedures.

The Introduction said: "Although the Committee’s intention remains, as a general principle, to use words closely following AICPA Statements (or other professional pronouncements) in cases where this is appropriate, consideration of responses received to the 1973 Exposure Draft indicated that several significant changes were desirable in this particular case. The November 1973 Exposure Draft contained two other Sections of background material, which have been eliminated. "Responsibilities and Functions of the Independent Auditor" required extensive changes and will be dealt with at a later date. The discussion previously included under the heading "The General Standards" related to ethical matters [emphasis added], which are within the jurisdiction of the provincial Institutes and Order. Accordingly, it is the Committee’s intention not to deal further with this topic in the Auditing Recommendations Section of the CICA Handbook, other than including the substance of the three November 1973 general standards as one general standard in paragraph 5100.02 in the interest of completeness."

It is noteworthy that the Introduction also said that, oncurrent with the issuance of this Exposure Draft as an Auditing Recommendation, the Committee would intend to amend the Introduction to Auditing Recommendations by inserting the following as a new paragraph in the "Application" section:

"Among the Recommendations issued, GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS, Section 5100, constitute the basic professional standards with which, in the Committee’s view, the auditor should comply when reporting upon financial statements. In adhering to such basic standards the auditor should have regard to the specific Auditing Recommendations in the Handbook while exercising his professional judgment [emphasis added] as to what procedures are required for such adherence. In addition, the Handbook provides Recommendations with respect to unaudited financial statements, to which Generally Accepted Auditing Standards do not apply."

Setting accounting and auditing standards in Canada - 1978

The article “Setting Accounting and Auditing Standards” was originally published in the September 1978 issue of CAmagazine. At that time, R.D. Thomas, FCA, was the CICA General Director of Research.

This article provides a detailed review of the existing standard-setting process. It notes that: “While the Research Department makes continual efforts to keep the 27,000 CICA members and over 13,000 other subscribers to the CICA Handbook informed on its projects in process, relatively few people appreciate the wide diversity of experience that those responsible bring to bear in the setting of Accounting and Auditing Recommendations, and the care they take in doing so."

"It’s important that those affected by these Recommendations know this background for at least two reasons:

(1) With the advent of the National Securities Administrators’ National Policy 27 and recent corporate legislation, Handbook Recommendations now have “authority” attached to them by federal and provincial government bodies, in addition to the support that has been given to them through the provincial institutes’ / order’s Rules of Professional Conduct.

(2) With the steady increase in the number and complexity of the subjects being dealt with by our research groups and with the resulting increasing demands on the time of volunteer members of these groups, a major study is now to be undertaken to see how our procedures can be improved. After reviewing the following highlight summary of the issues involved, any comments or suggestions you may have on present or prospective procedures and personnel will be very useful to the in-depth review which will be starting shortly.”

(For more information, refer to the CICA Special Committee on Standard-Setting (SCOSS), Report to the CICA Board of Governors on December 19, 1980.)

Report of the CICA Special Committee on Standard-Setting (SCOSS) - 1980

On December 19, 1980, the CICA Special Committee on Standard-Setting (SCOSS) presented its Report to the CICA Board of Governors. This comprehensive 158-page report states (pages 9-10) that: “If one is to consider the means by which accounting and auditing standards are to be set and maintained, one should first have a clear understanding of what is, or should be, the appropriate role, nature and scope of those standards.”

According to the SCOSS report: “A brief history of the standard-setting function in Canada and the way the nature and role of standards have evolved may help to set the stage. This history will essentially be that of accounting standards, since accounting standards as such have been in existence for much longer than auditing standards and they are, besides, much more in the public domain than auditing standards.

There have been accounting standards in Canada for a very long time. At no time in the past century would it have been possible for a preparer of financial statements to make up his own accounting practices without considering conventional usage, even though the accepted conventional practices may not have been published anywhere. Although our main concern today is for the development of published standards, it should not be forgotten that there are, even now, many accounting standards that are generally accepted and universally followed but have not yet been published. For example, there is no requirement in the CICA Handbook to depreciate fixed assets or to follow the matching principle generally.

The CICA published its first accounting standard in 1946. It was published in the form of a Bulletin, which continued to be the form of publication for more than twenty years. Twenty-six Bulletins were published between 1946 and 1967. Of these, six were published in the years 1965-67. In 1967, as a result of the report of a committee such as ours, the CICA Handbook came into existence and the Bulletins then in force were incorporated into it. The bulk of the material in the present Handbook has been added since 1968. The pace of standard-setting has clearly accelerated, and continues to do so.

It is difficult to generalize about the thought processes involved and the purposes behind projects carried out by standard-setters in the past. Nevertheless, it appears that the early Bulletins were essentially attempts to codify best existing practices rather than to change existing practice generally. In most cases the early Bulletins were non-controversial and the best practice was fairly clearly recognized. Their purpose was to discourage less desirable practices that were being followed in a minority of cases. Over time, however, the Bulletins, and later the Handbook, became progressively more innovative in the sense of changing practices generally rather than merely eliminating minority practices.

The trend away from codifying consensus to establishing new practice was due, in part, to the 1967 Report of the Study Group on Methods of Work and Organization (chaired by P.H. Lyons, FCA) which stated: “The Research Committee, to a much greater extent than it has in the past, should engage in initiating and overseeing basic research at the frontiers of our profession rather than gathering together to record the best current practice.”

Recent accounting standards, such as those on segmented reporting, accounting for leases and disclosure of transactions with related parties, have clearly changed the accounting and disclosure practices of the majority of Canadian enterprises rather than merely imposing on a stubborn minority accounting and disclosure practices already adopted by the majority. It is not always easy to categorize a particular standard as being essentially a codification of consensus on the one hand or a changing of the rules on the other – but, in general, the trend from the former approach to the latter seems indisputable. Moreover, the history of the process makes it apparent that this attitudinal change was primarily internally generated rather than forced on the profession from outside.

Undoubtedly, the most important development in the standard-setting arena since the Handbook came into existence is the conferring of quasi-legislative status on the Handbook. This process began with National Policy #27 adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators in 1972. Since then, various federal and provincial statutes (and regulations thereunder) have come to require that financial statements prepared pursuant to those statutes must comply with the CICA Handbook.

The impact of this development on the perceived authority of the Handbook and the additional responsibilities it may, or may not, impose on standard-setters will be discussed later. However, while it is not possible to tell whether standards issued since the acquisition of this quasi-legislative status would have been different if such status had never been granted, it is possible that they might have been affected by the existence of this factor, and that future standards may be affected. The Handbook in its present form might be said to be largely a professionally- oriented set of standards with some of the latest (and future) additions perhaps being legislatively oriented. There could be conflicts in this potentially dual character of the Handbook.”

In addition to the above-noted discussion on the evolution of Canadian standards, the SCOSS report (pages 11-14) discusses the need for professional judgment in standard-setting, taking a principles-based approach, using principles rather than detailed rules, and clearly stating the role of professional judgment in the CICA Handbook. Although the report was issued more than 30 years ago, the observations and views of the Special Committee appear to be equally valid today. (For a review of the discussion on professional judgment, refer to the four-part series posted in the blog on Professional Judgment Matters.)

The Evolution of US GAAP, Part II: 1973-2004

This article, the second of a two-part commentary about accounting standards setting, chronicles the rising importance of financial accounting standards in different sectors of the US economy, which has led to increasing special-interest lobbying for accounting standards with characteristics compatible with the desired outcomes. Financial accounting standards affect the US economy in many ways, both in the aggregate and in the distribution of income, wealth and risk. This commentary captures many of the key issues that have preoccupied standards setters, and especially identifies the efforts of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to implement an asset-and-liability approach to recognition and a fair-value approach to measurement.

According to the author, “When a highly prescriptive standards setter is coupled with a rigorous enforcement process used by a government regulator to secure compliance with accounting standards, especially in a confrontational society such as the United States, companies and even branches of government will lobby the standards setter not to approve standards that interfere with their business plans and strategies. This is what has happened increasingly in the United States since the 1970s, and there is no sign that, on sensitive and controversial issues, it will diminish in intensity or frequency.”

(Read more in the article “The Evolution of U.S. GAAP: The Political Forces Behind Professional Standards (Part II)” by Stephen A. Zeff, PhD, in the February 2005 issue of The CPA Journal online.)

The Evolution of US GAAP, Part 1: 1930-1973

In 2005, The CPA Journal marked its 75th anniversary by publishing an assessment of the path of accounting standards setting over the previous 75 years. This commentary on the evolution of US GAAP was presented in two parts.

The first part covers the years from 1930 to 1973. The second part covers the years from 1973 to 2004. The focus is deliberately on incidents that represented important changes in practice or in the way in which accounting principles and standards were set.



Read about the history of US accounting standards in the article “The Evolution of U.S. GAAP: The Political Forces Behind Professional Standards” by Stephen A. Zeff, PhD, in the January 2005 issue of The CPA Journal online.

About the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA)

The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) will celebrate its 110^th anniversary in 2012. Established in 1902 as the Dominion Association of Chartered Accountants, its goal was to develop the highest professional standards for the young country that was Canada. Now, the CICA is recognized as one of the most influential standard-setters in the world and is a leader in the global effort to create and implement international standards that will allow investors to compare reliable financial information from companies everywhere. The CICA serves the interests of society and the CA profession by providing leadership to uphold the professional integrity, standards and pre-eminence of Canada's Chartered Accountants, nationally and internationally. For an overview of the first 100 years of the CICA’s history, read the article “Setting the standard” in the May 2002 CAmagazine.

Use and Meaning of "Market" in Inventory Valuation - A CICA Research Study 1963

In January 1963, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) published the first in a long series of Research Studies. Prepared by Gertrude Mulcahy, FCA, it was called Use and Meaning of "Market" in Inventory Valuation.

The Foreword states: “While the practice of valuing inventories at "the lower of cost and market" has a long tradition behind it in Canada, relatively little has been specifically written about the use of the term "market", and the purpose and application of the concept, in valuing inventories in this country. The meaning of "cost" in inventory valuation has been covered in the Institute's Bulletin No.5; and there have been official pronouncements by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants on the use and meaning of "market". While this Research Study, as with all studies in this series, does not purport to represent an official Institute view, it represents an organized examination of this most important area by an author familiar with the background of Canadian business. It is to be hoped that this study will be the basis of much thought and discussion among accountants and other businessmen in Canada; and, probably in other countries as well.”

It goes on to acknowledge that “While the study reflects only the views of the author, Miss Mulcahy received valuable comments and assistance from the Toronto and Montreal members of the 1962-63 Committee on Accounting and Auditing Research, in particular from Mr. R. M. Skinner, F.C.A. who reviewed successive drafts of the study. I know she would want me to express her appreciation for this help.”

Approaches to Dealing with Risk and Uncertainty - 1990 CICA Research Report

The 1990 CICA Research Report, Approaches to Dealing with Risk and Uncertainty, was prepared by J.E. Boritz, PhD, FCA. He was assisted by an 8-member Advisory Group. This Research Report (about 160 pages) was developed in response to a recommendation in the Report of the Commission to Study the Public's Expectations of Audits (published in June 1988), commonly referred to as the Macdonald Commission Report.

The recommendation in  the Macdonald Commission Report stated that "the CICA should initiate and complete as soon as possible a study of risks and uncertainties leading to conclusions as to how they may best be disclosed in financial statements or elsewhere (e.g., in Management's Discussion and Analysis in the annual report)." Accordingly, the primary purpose of the Research Report is to discuss and summarize some of the key issues, and to recommend what further action should be taken.

CICA Task Force on Standard Setting - Final Report 1998

The Final Report of the CICA Task Force on Standard Setting (TFOSS) was issued in May 1998. It represented the culmination of almost two years of deliberations involving extensive communication and consultation with stakeholders in the standard-setting community, both in Canada and abroad. TFOSS expressed a belief in four-long-term goals articulated in its Report. These include the ultimate achievement of one set of internationally-accepted accounting and auditing standards, with Canada playing a significant role in their development.

According to TFOSS, Canada's ability to fulfil that role in the future, as well as to maintain its leadership in setting national private and public sector standards and developing emerging and innovative areas of service to the public, will depend on the commitment of adequate human and financial resources. This commitment has traditionally come from the CICA. But, in the future, TFOSS believes that it must also come from others who benefit from standards, particularly in accounting, but possibly in other areas as well. Their participation and support will serve to enhance the CICA's position as it continues to lead the profession in the years ahead.

History of the FATF (1990-2010)

In response to mounting concern over money laundering, the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) was established by the G-7 Summit that was held in Paris in 1989.

Recognizing the threat posed to the banking system and to financial institutions, the G-7 Heads of State or Government and President of the European Commission convened the Task Force from the G-7 member States, the European Commission and eight other countries.

The Task Force was given the responsibility of examining money laundering techniques and trends, reviewing the action which had already been taken at a national or international level, and setting out the measures that still needed to be taken to combat money laundering. In April 1990, less than one year after its creation, the FATF issued a report containing a set of Forty Recommendations, which provide a comprehensive plan of action needed to fight against money laundering.

In 2001, the development of standards in the fight against terrorist financing was added to the mission of the FATF. In October 2001, the FATF issued the Eight Special Recommendations to deal with the issue of terrorist financing. The continued evolution of money laundering techniques led the FATF to revise the FATF standards comprehensively in June 2003. In October 2004, the FATF published a Ninth Special Recommendation, further strengthening the agreed international standards for combating money laundering and terrorist financing - the 40+9 Recommendations.

To learn more, read the publication 20 Years of the FATF Recommendations 1990-2010.

Evolution of US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - 1930 to 2004

The accounting history paper Evolution of US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) was prepared by Stephen A. Zeff, Rice University. The paper outlines noteworthy developments in US GAAP from 1930 to 2004. The focus is deliberately on those incidents that represented important changes in practice or in the way that accounting principles or standards were set. These incidents are typically ones for which interesting ‘stories’ can be told about the underlying factors that led to the developments. Many of these stories involve efforts by the preparers of financial statements, or by a branch of government, to engage in ‘political’ lobbying in order to promote their narrow interests; for example, to present a more favourable earnings picture or to promote the effectiveness of government fiscal policy. Yet many US accounting standards have been issued that truly reflect the application of sound concepts, undiluted by ‘political’ lobbying. Because these principled standards have emerged in a natural progression from the underlying concepts, their stories are not as ‘interesting’ as those that were driven by ‘political’ lobbying. (Stephen A. Zeff was inducted into the Accounting Hall of Fame in 2002.)

CICA - Setting the standard

It may come as a surprise to some people that an influential body, such as the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), had rather inauspicious beginnings. This, however, is what makes its history a matter of prime interest.

The CICA has grown from nothing into a powerful national organization that is consulted by governments – a body with power to set standards that are incorporated into law. Read the article “Setting the standard” in CAmagazine (May 2002).

Corporate Reporting: Its Future Evolution (1980)

In 1980, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) published a landmark research study called Corporate Reporting: Its Future Evolution. "The study is directed to all those who are interested or concerned with the publication and the use of corporate financial information in Canada and elsewhere. It should be of particular interest to accounting standard setters, but the analysis, argument and conclusions are equally important to all of the other groups of people interested in financial accounting." Chapter 10 of the study offers a proposed evolutionary solution to the problem of establishing accounting standards.

Going digital - Global Accounting Alliance

The Global Accounting Alliance (GAA) comprises the world's leading professional accountancy institutes. It promotes quality services, shares information and collaborates on important international issues. As part of this effort, the GAA publishes an online journal to which its member organizations, including the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), contribute articles. The April 2010 issue of GAA Accounting is available online and as a Digital Edition. Digital archives date back to June 2008.

A digital review of the history of the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC)

The website of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) provides an overview of its predecessor, the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) which operated from 1973 until 2001. It states that the IASC was founded in June 1973 as a result of an agreement by accountancy bodies in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Ireland, and the United States. The overview information has been supplemented for events between June 1998 and December 2005.

Other digital sources include Deloitte IAS Plus which presents the International Accounting Standards Committee History – 1973 to March 2001. It also presents a Chronology setting out the pre-1973 Events Leading to Formation of IASC and continuing to 2010. Additional background information on the IASC is available at Wikipedia and in the 2007 publication Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets. A History of the IASC 1973-2000 by Camfferman and Zeff. Excerpts from this publication can be read online at Google Books.

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) - 30 years of progress

In many ways, 1977 marked a year of firsts: the Concorde jet inaugurated regular transatlantic supersonic flight; the first Apple II microcomputers went on sale to the general public; the movie “Star Wars” debuted on the big screen; and the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) convened for the first time in an auditorium in Munich, Germany at the 11th World Congress of Accountants. Beginning with 63 members in 1977, IFAC's membership has grown over the past 30 years to now include 157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions worldwide. At the first meeting of the IFAC Assembly and Council in October 1977, a 12-point work program was developed to guide IFAC committees and staff through the first five years of activities. Many elements of this work program are still relevant today. As part of its 30th anniversary activities, IFAC published a history of the organization,  IFAC: 30 Years of Progress  -Encouraging Quality and Building Trust, which explores the role of member bodies and others in IFAC’s growth and the issues that impacted its development. Further information on organization’s development, including additional historical articles, is available on the IFAC history page.